<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thinking about robots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thinksix.net/archives/965/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thinksix.net/archives/965</link>
	<description>young Chinese in new China</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 11:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alec</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksix.net/archives/965#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksix.net/?p=965#comment-1902</guid>
		<description>p.s. yes: http://is.gd/7bzFR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>p.s. yes: <a href="http://is.gd/7bzFR" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/7bzFR</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anastasia</title>
		<link>http://www.thinksix.net/archives/965#comment-1901</link>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thinksix.net/?p=965#comment-1901</guid>
		<description>But...can we call an organic system a robot? From what a standard definition of any AI textbook tells us a robot (or any machine) is mostly "a binary system" (or at least was till not so long ago) that is a very sophisticated bit of equipment  that 'thinks' in  "0111001.....". What if that is how we think? Of cause, you would argue that binary systems can't learn and their "thinking abilities" are the result of the original input. The studies of cognitive phonology, however, have proven to me that the rules of human speech and pronunciation can be (and are already) reduced into computer language with a hierarchic structure (e.g. with the help of original input a device can generate rules..!). The point is - we might be robots after all ^_^. 
P.S Is it true that a mountain in Hunan was renamed after Avatar's Hallelujah Mountain? Official ceremony and all that??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But&#8230;can we call an organic system a robot? From what a standard definition of any AI textbook tells us a robot (or any machine) is mostly &#8220;a binary system&#8221; (or at least was till not so long ago) that is a very sophisticated bit of equipment  that &#8216;thinks&#8217; in  &#8220;0111001&#8230;..&#8221;. What if that is how we think? Of cause, you would argue that binary systems can&#8217;t learn and their &#8220;thinking abilities&#8221; are the result of the original input. The studies of cognitive phonology, however, have proven to me that the rules of human speech and pronunciation can be (and are already) reduced into computer language with a hierarchic structure (e.g. with the help of original input a device can generate rules..!). The point is - we might be robots after all ^_^.<br />
P.S Is it true that a mountain in Hunan was renamed after Avatar&#8217;s Hallelujah Mountain? Official ceremony and all that??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
